Gives the term “knife edge design” new meaning. Don’t the doors open telepathically? Nothing’s ever been done just quite like this, although the ’61 Conti does give it a run for the money. The blade does double duty as my favorite door handle ever. I’m sure you’re not surprised when I reiterate that it’s by far the best of the bunch: clean, original, (mostly) lacking the clutter of group-think throwing too many styling gimmicks at it. It may well be why the Bullets sold less than both the Square birds before it and the Flair birds after it. It rises from the steeply sloping front end, that was way too un-American for Americans, lacking a big open mouth. The most dramatic and original feature of the Bullet Bird is the sharp blade that serves as its belt line. That was convenient for production reasons too, allowing both cars to share aspects of their unibody innards. Does Engel’s proposal look familiar? Ford President Robert McNamara ran into it by accident, liked it, and had it turned into the 1961 Lincoln. Elwood Engel’s design proposal (above) lost out to the winning one by Bill Boyer and others. The 1961 Thunderbird might well have looked very different than it turned out. Mercury was doomed anyway Ford just didn’t do the multiple brand thing well, and at least they’ve finally embraced that reality now. Has anyone thought about how the poor Mercury dealers felt during the T-Bird’s heyday? What was Ford doing selling such an upscale and exclusive car anyway, especially when it sported the optional (and popular) Landau package? Sucks to be them, then and more recently. And the T-Bird practically owned the market segment it created, for way longer than GM would have liked, despite everything they threw at it. McNamara made the right call when he backed the big change to four-passenger Birds in 1958. The big Birds outsold the ‘Vette by almost ten to one. And it was about as sporty as they were, but who cared? The T-Bird had long ago ceded that role to the Corvette, while it was laughing all the way to the bank. It evoked the classic roadsters of the thirties, with their long tails and no pretense of practicality. Of course it was a bit ridiculous, but don’t tell that to an eleven year-old agog, or the proud driver. Available for 19, the fiberglass cover over the rear seats was meant to evoke the original two-seat T-Bird. The highlight of my fling with the 61-63 T-Bird came when we were on vacation in NY, and I saw a red Sports Roadster in the flesh for the first time (there were none in Iowa City). I guess the public didn’t quite agree with me, because the Square Bird outsold the Bullet Bird, right through its last year (1960). They impressed me on some level, the interior, mainly, but I though their front ends looked like a hideous creature from the depths of the ocean. I have mixed feelings about Ford’s late fifties styling, and that extended to the 1958 – 1960 “Square Bird”, regardless of how revolutionary a car it was. Was 1961 Ford’s finest hour, at least for a very long time to come? In my book, yes. The American Dream has never been a static affair. In my dream driveway, the T-Bird was were replaced by an ever changing palette of GM’s finest. Mark of Excellence, and my brief childhood love affair with Ford was mostly over. The squared-off, fussy 1964 T-Bird confirmed my defection to the Church of St. Just three years later, both the stunning 1961-1963 “Bullet Bird” and Kennedy were gone. Yes, in the fall of 1960, Ford was building my dream. In America anyone could realistically aspire to own a car that actually looked like a Dream Car in a car show, one that would glamorously jet you away from the humdrum of ordinary life, if not exactly rocket you to the moon. What more was there to aspire to then this? Seeing fifty of these convertibles in Kennedy’s Inaugural Parade only cemented the image. (first posted ) What exactly is the American Dream? Was it easier to answer that question fifty years ago? If you were seven years old, and had just arrived from Austria at the same time the 1961 Thunderbird first appeared, the answer is definitely yes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |